![wolfgang pauli not even wrong wolfgang pauli not even wrong](https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/3840x2160/1907178-Wolfgang-Pauli-Quote-That-s-not-right-That-s-not-even-wrong.jpg)
When he gets into the history of string theory, however, his pace accelerates alarmingly, with highly sketchy chapters. The first half of Woit's book is a tightly argued, beautifully written account of the development of the standard model and includes a history of particle accelerators that will interest science buffs. Wolfgang Pauli Denkstoffe und Nachttrume. It hasn't predicted anything, as theories are required to do, and its practitioners have become so desperate, says Woit, that they're willing to redefine what doing science means in order to justify their labors. Triple Not-Even-Wrong, as Wolfgang Pauli Would Put It + On Saturday, Jat 7:07:34 AM UTC-7, Katie Higgins wrote: > ALL of chas’ spamming and trolling here has to do with one crucial fact, chas does not believe Nichiren’s own words disregards Nichiren’s original,authentic teachings and declares he/she has such superior understanding of the Lotus Sutra that he:she can claim. Hans bermte bemrkning om sdan en artikel var derfor: It is not even wrong2, det er ikke engang. in theoretical physics and a lecturer in mathematics at Columbia, points out again and again that string theory, despite its two decades of dominance, is just a hunch aspiring to be a theory. But echoing Lee Smolin's forthcoming The Trouble with Physics (Reviews, July 24), Woit, a Ph.D.
![wolfgang pauli not even wrong wolfgang pauli not even wrong](https://images.slideplayer.com/24/7519463/slides/slide_6.jpg)
String theory is the only game in town in physics departments these days. In the face of many books from enthusiasts for string theory, this book presents the other side of the story. Not Even Wrong explains why the mathematical conditions for progress in physics are entirely absent from superstring theory today and shows that judgments about scientific statements, which should be based on the logical consistency of argument and experimental evidence, are instead based on the eminence of those claiming to know the truth. It makes no predictions, even wrong ones, and this very lack of falsifiability is what has allowed the subject to survive and flourish. 'Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch' 'That is not only not right, it is not even wrong'-Credited to physicist Wolfgang PauliNot even wrong is often applied, in various paraphrasings, to any theory or argument that confuses its terms to such a point that a systematic rebuttal is not feasible. In Not Even Wrong, he shows that what many physicists call superstring "theory" is not a theory at all.
![wolfgang pauli not even wrong wolfgang pauli not even wrong](http://img.picturequotes.com/2/875/874144/if-speculative-ideas-can-not-be-tested-theyre-not-science-they-dont-even-rise-to-the-level-of-being-quote-1.jpg)
In Peter Woit's view, superstring theory is just such an idea. At what point does theory depart the realm of testable hypothesis and come to resemble something like aesthetic speculation, or even theology? The legendary physicist Wolfgang Pauli had a phrase for such ideas: He would describe them as "not even wrong," meaning that they were so incomplete that they could not even be used to make predictions to compare with observations to see whether they were wrong or not. To borrow a phrase from the theoretical physicist Wolfgang Pauli, this is not even wrong.